From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove ide-scsi
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:56:36 +0100
Message-ID: <200812070156.37057.bzolnier@gmail.com>
References: <20081203103856S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <200812070040.49377.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081206235124.00fe60fc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081206235124.00fe60fc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Dan =?iso-8859-1?q?No=E9?= <dpn@isomerica.net>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, osst@riede.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

On Sunday 07 December 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Still, we can certainly leave ide-scsi there if you or somebody else
> > want to maintain it (which didn't happen for the last year).  It would
> > be best to start with fixing years long issues with error handling and
> > taking the work on updating driver for IDE changes off my shoulder...
> 
> You could just stop turning the old IDE driver into an experimental

I find your mail offensive/unfair and I'm not going to discuss things
at such level if you're going to continue in this style.

I also regretfully assume that the answer to my question is negative...