From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Raz <raziebe@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intel X25-M MLC SSD benchmarks - How can I be sure i am erased block aligned ?
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081212012451.GG26095@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d96567b0812111240i60f70974y815a0775006da05f@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Raz wrote:
> > ________________________________
> > From: Matthew Wilcox [mailto:matthew@wil.cx]
> > Sent: Thu 12/11/2008 5:44 AM
> > To: Raz Ben-Yehuda
> > Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: Intel X25-M MLC SSD benchmarks
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:12:37AM +0200, Raz Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >> I did not want to dive into details because it does not matter. Whether
> >> noop,deadline, deadline parameters...
> >> As for the controller I used 4 different controllers. Adaptec,AHCI and
> >> Intel as Integrated chips on the 1025W-UR supermicro motherboard, and a
> >> 4-th controller SuperMicro UIO Adaptec aac card.
> >> All gave same results for most dd writes commands.
> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct , and many
> >> other variants such erase block size ( 128K ) , several erase block size
> >> and so on. Kernel is 2.6.18-8.el5.
> >
> >>>OK, I suspect you aren't giving the drive enough work to do for it to
> >>>perform at its best. Try doing something like this:
> >
> >>>for i in $(seq 0 9); do \
> > >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct \
> > >> seek=$(($i * 1000)) & \
> >>>done
> >
> did that. nothing. also, I would like to note that IO flow is quite
> weird.iostats reports 70GB/s in the first few seconds, and then it
> degrades to 20
> MB/s and less. could it be that I am not erase-block aligment ?
That doesn't sound likely to me. Erase block size isn't a huge issue
with these drives. I've been trying to replicate your problem, but I'm
not having any luck; unfortunately I only have access to an X25-E drive
(not an X25-M) and I'm seeing 175-185MB/s when it's attached to an AHCI
controller, just with a single dd (I haven't even played with the
elevator). I'm trying to get hold of an X25-M drive, but I don't know
when I'll receive one.
> how does SSD aligments interacts with a controller ?
Controllers can generally send down large enough IOs that it isn't a
problem. And the Intel SSDs are smart enough that you shouldn't have to
align to erase block boundaries to make them go fast.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-12 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-11 20:40 Intel X25-M MLC SSD benchmarks - How can I be sure i am erased block aligned ? Raz
2008-12-12 1:24 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-12-15 12:59 ` Raz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081212012451.GG26095@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raziebe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).