From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ide-atapi: remove ide_atapi_pc from the irq handler Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:29:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20081217192956.GA6316@gollum.tnic> References: <1229412969-3552-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <200812162135.27902.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081217072543.GA828@gollum.tnic> <200812171745.41830.bzolnier@gmail.com> Reply-To: petkovbb@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com ([209.85.218.21]:36289 "EHLO mail-bw0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752736AbYLQT34 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:29:56 -0500 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so204167bwz.13 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:29:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812171745.41830.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hi, > [ Yes, I'm a bit disappointed that 2.6.29 is going to be the next release > that we will miss on ide-cd -> ide-atapi conversion (I was initially > hoping for .28) and the fact that in few weeks this will become a limiting > factor to the further progress on core IDE changes (despite few issues > to still take care of things are starting to look really well there)... ] ok, I get the idea, and I'm sorry for mis-prioritizing the things we have to work on but it's not like I've been idling - as you're well aware, we had a couple of nasty bugs in the past months which had to be taken care of. Anyways, I don't think it is too late yet for .29 since the merge window is not open yet and I might whip up some patches in the next couple of days... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.