From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:13:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090104101353.05e8df09@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090104180515.GD2002@parisc-linux.org>
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:05:15 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:29:40AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >From 2087b546abddced50fa73ea9a71b5a040ae1026e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > >2001
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:32:28 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous
> >
> > This patch makes part of the scsi probe (which is mostly device
> > spin up and the partition scan) asynchronous. Only the part that
> > runs after getting the device number allocated is asynchronous,
> > ensuring that device numbering remains stable.
>
> Is this really a big win? Were you using the async scsi scan code
> already?
just checked;
my box has CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y set for both cases
it seems to be about 0.1 seconds win still though...
sounds little, but a kernel boot should be less than a second, so that
is still 10%. And it's obviously also disk dependent..
(I used libata connected disks obviously)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-04 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 17:24 [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] fastboot: Asynchronous function calls to speed up kernel boot Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 18:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 19:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 19:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 19:52 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-04 17:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-04 18:13 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-01-04 18:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-04 18:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] fastboot: make the libata port scan asynchronous Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] fastboot: make ACPI bus drivers probe asynchronous Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 2:03 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-05 1:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 2:51 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-05 2:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 5:30 ` Zhao Yakui
2009-01-04 18:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 18:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 21:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 19:46 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-04 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-04 19:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-04 21:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-11 13:14 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-05 6:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-01-05 8:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-05 10:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-05 11:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-01-07 2:41 ` Shaohua Li
[not found] <fa.h0UoSd20jEtik35h1v63j+E67Io@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.5PP24JO26n+WYiDr/9b4OySGjWY@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.FlPVm6dv2aVhxgrZlA92A/26QC8@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.xSdAPowIDNEH2rL6hWZp0t33p2U@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.abMnCBprOI1BL1RNVaAvYnUsaEw@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.opIcflAvDANLuO5+8NjVCjt/94o@ifi.uio.no>
2009-01-04 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] fastboot: make scsi probes asynchronous Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090104101353.05e8df09@infradead.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).