From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
Karl Auerbach <karl@iwl.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, karl@cavebear.com,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@mkp.net>
Subject: Re: Some IDE issues with 2.6.28 on PC-Engines ALIX2
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:38:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901051838.37608.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105171935.4e0c077e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Monday 05 January 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Both are done by block layer. The former is controlled by the user-space
> > while the latter is controlled by the block driver.
>
> And in the old IDE case erroneously set for any device reporting CFA via
> the kernel. Queue flag management belongs in user space because its far
> more complex than you seem to think to get it right.
Please stop playing straw man in almost every your mail. Doing it once
in a while can be intriguing or even enjoyable but doing it on daily basis
kills any sensible debate...
There is nothing incorrect in setting non-rotational queue flag for CF
devices [1] and I wasn't suggesting where it should belong -- I was solely
describing how things look up currently.
[1] in fact some SSD devices present themselves as CF devices
Thanks,
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 0:37 Some IDE issues with 2.6.28 on PC-Engines ALIX2 Karl Auerbach
2009-01-05 3:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-05 12:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-05 13:33 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 17:47 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-05 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-05 11:36 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 23:23 ` Karl Auerbach
2009-01-05 23:27 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-06 12:58 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-06 19:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-06 19:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 12:08 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-05 16:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 16:52 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 17:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 17:19 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 17:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-01-05 18:00 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-05 18:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 22:41 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-11 17:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-31 21:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-02-01 16:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-31 11:25 Christoph .J Thompson
2009-01-31 12:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-31 14:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-31 14:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-01-31 14:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-31 16:27 ` Christoph .J Thompson
2009-01-31 16:35 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901051838.37608.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=karl@cavebear.com \
--cc=karl@iwl.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@mkp.net \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).