linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc2] palm_bk3710 buildfix
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:07:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901191307.33405.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4974408A.9050608@ru.mvista.com>

On Monday 19 January 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello, I wrote:
> 
> >>>> Someone should fix hw_regs_t to neither be a typedef, nor
> >>>> use "unsigned long" where it should use "void __iomem *".
> >>>>       
> >>>     It cannot use pointers of course -- as the addresses can be I/O 
> >>> ports.
> >>>     
> >>
> >> It could use the ioread*() calls, which take pointers
> >> and handle both types of I/O in a type-safe manner.
> >>   
> >
> >   Probably they can... though using those would only slow down 
> > register access on x86.
> 
>    ... and cause code bloat due to switching to real function calls from 
> inlines which now should render into in/out isns.

OTOH it would allow to unify a lot of 'if (hwif->host_flags & IDE_HFLAG_MMIO)'
cases so the code may even shrink.  I also suspect that register access slow
down is most likely negligable (we can always measure and check it).

The real reason for not using ioread*() and co. is that not all archs support
them (though I checked some time ago, maybe they do now?) and we don't want to
break IDE support for them.

Thanks,
Bart

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-19 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-18 16:33 [patch 2.6.29-rc2] palm_bk3710 buildfix David Brownell
2009-01-18 17:14 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-19  0:29   ` David Brownell
2009-01-19  8:35     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-19  8:57       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-19 12:07         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-01-19 13:06           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-19 14:14             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-19 12:00   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 13:03     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-19 13:21       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901191307.33405.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).