From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
debian-user@lists.debian.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:07:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120200741.GA1020@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49753BDE.8050403@shaw.ca>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:50:06PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Given the corruption happens at high block numbers, I'm wondering
> > if maybe there's some kind of wraparound bug happening here.
> > (Though why only the 0x00 pattern fails would still be a mystery).
>
> Yeah, that seems a bit bizarre.. Apparently somehow zeros are being
> converted into non-zero.. Can you try zeroing out the partition by
> dd'ing into it from /dev/zero or something, then dumping it back out to
> see what kind of data is showing up?
Hmm, it seems the failed firmware update has killed the eeprom.
It no longer reports the right PCI vendor ID.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-03 20:04 Corrupt data - RAID sata_sil 3114 chip Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 20:53 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-03 21:11 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 23:23 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-07 4:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-07 5:38 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-07 15:31 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-11 0:32 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-11 0:43 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-12 1:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-19 18:43 ` Dave Jones
2009-01-20 2:50 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-20 20:07 ` Dave Jones [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-29 16:13 Ulli.Brennenstuhl
2010-01-29 19:37 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-06 3:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-06 15:16 ` Tim Small
2010-02-07 16:09 ` Robert Hancock
2010-02-08 2:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-08 14:25 ` Tim Small
[not found] <bQVFb-3SB-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFb-3SB-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFb-3SB-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFc-3SB-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFc-3SB-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFc-3SB-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bQVFb-3SB-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4963306F.4060504@sm7jqb.se>
2009-01-06 10:48 ` Justin Piszcz
[not found] <495E01E3.9060903@sm7jqb.se>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901020741200.11852@p34.internal.lan>
2009-01-02 21:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-02 21:47 ` Twigathy
2009-01-03 2:31 ` Redeeman
2009-01-03 13:13 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 13:39 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-03 16:20 ` Bernd Schubert
2009-01-03 18:31 ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-03 22:19 ` James Youngman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120200741.GA1020@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bs@q-leap.de \
--cc=debian-user@lists.debian.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).