From: Jody Belka <lists-lkml@pimb.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: marvell sata status?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:33:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090121013335.GL8281@pimb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <495E3C92.2070304@rtr.ca>
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:10:58AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Jody Belka wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 02:11:37PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >>On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Jody Belka wrote:
> >>>Cool, I think I'll go for that card then (Adaptec 1430SA). They're
> >>>x4, so good bandwidth, and i'll use the x16 slots on my board for
> >>>them. Only need one for now, but two eventually. And they're a good
> >>>price, at only £77 each.
> >>Does the card 'recognize' disks as SATA or do you have to export them as
> >>JBOD? The star tech card allows you to see the sata drives directly.
> >
> >Well, it's just fake-raid, so surely you can always see the individual
> >drives?
> >Are there actually cards out there that don't? *boggle*
> >
> >Hmm.... ok, checking the Adaptec knowledgebase:
> >
> >Q: Can drives be used on an Adaptec RAID controller but not be used as
> > part of a RAID array?
> >
> >A: Hard drives attached to an Adaptec RAID controller do not have to be
> > configured as an array member to work properly. The RAID controller
> > will recognize and access single disks. Please refer to your controller
> > documentation for instructions on accessing drives that are not a member
> > of any RAID array.
> ..
>
> I suppose, of all of the vendors, Adaptec probably has the best chance
> of getting that part right, and probably without randomly writing metadata
> somewhere on the drive simply for JBOD.
>
> Anyone know for sure ?
To follow up on this, I've now picked up one of these cards, and just did
a quick test. Plugged a drive into an on-board socket, booted, made a copy
of about the first 2MB. Blanked that 2MB out, swapped onto the new card,
booted, made a new copy, swapped back to on-board, booted, and made another
copy. Both copies, and a blank 2MB file, md5sum'ed identically, so it looks
like it's safe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 5:10 marvell sata status? Jody Belka
2009-01-01 9:54 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-01 14:07 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-01 18:44 ` Jody Belka
2009-01-01 19:11 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-01 19:43 ` Jody Belka
2009-01-02 16:09 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 16:10 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 18:03 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-02 20:18 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 20:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-03 5:04 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-03 9:13 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-01-03 14:44 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-03 14:46 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-21 1:33 ` Jody Belka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090121013335.GL8281@pimb.org \
--to=lists-lkml@pimb.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).