From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12263] Sata soft reset filling log
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:30:45 +0100
Message-ID: <20090215223045.GC29300@elte.hu>
References: <sTyoMUwdm9B.A.QCH.U40lJB@chimera> <ROx6X68CGJG.A.ahB.b50lJB@chimera> <49987F49.7050202@gawab.com> <200902152221.43834.rjw@sisk.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:52363 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752491AbZBOWbW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:31:22 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200902152221.43834.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>, Linux IDE <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> On Sunday 15 February 2009, Justin Madru wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12263
> > > Subject		: Sata soft reset filling log
> > > Submitter	: Justin Madru <bevicm@dslextreme.com>
> > > Date		: 2008-12-13 2:07 (64 days old)
> > > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122913412608533&w=4
> > 
> > I'm still seeing this on .29-rc5, and I think that my bug #12263 is a 
> > duplicate of bug #12609,
> > or more correctly it's a duplicate of mine because I reported first.
> > 
> > It seems like the bug has been fixed in tip/master for some time now.
> > Below is the diff of origin and tip from when I tested.
> 
> Ingo, do you know whinch patch in -tip fixes this regression?

This one, done on Jan 10, more than a month ago:

  f1d26da: Revert "libata: Add 32bit PIO support"

When a commit causes trouble in -tip qa i immediately revert it in 95% 
of the cases, no questions asked. Especially if it's related to 
persistent storage.

	Ingo