linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:07:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090226030735.GA16891@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090226025043.GJ1363@mit.edu>

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:50:43PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 06:27:18PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > Because of 63-sector legacy problems a bunch of ATA vendors will
> > initially ship 512/4096 drives that are not naturally aligned.
> > I.e. logical sector 63 will be aligned on a 4KB hardware sector
> > boundary to overcome the misaligned default partitioning.
> 
> Are we *sure* that this is what they plan to be doing?  Is there a way
> we can query the hardware to find out for sure what drives are doing
> what?

The drive I have that's pretending to be a 512/4k drive reports this:

$ sudo sg_readcap -l /dev/sdc
Read Capacity results:
   Protection: prot_en=0, p_type=0
   Last logical block address=625142447 (0x2542eaaf), Number of logical blocks=625142448
   Logical block length=512 bytes
   Logical blocks per physical block=3 (log base 2) [actual=8]
   Lowest aligned logical block address=0
Hence:
   Device size: 320072933376 bytes, 305245.3 MiB, 320.07 GB

This disagrees with Martin's assertion.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-26  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-25 22:24 ATA support for 4k sector size Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] ata: Define new commands from ATA8 Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and Long Physical Sectors Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-25 22:53 ` ATA support for 4k sector size H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:27   ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-25 23:33     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:51       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 12:43       ` Karel Zak
2009-02-26 15:17         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:42     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:55       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-25 23:57         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-26  0:07           ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  0:10             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-26  0:17               ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-25 23:49     ` david
2009-02-26  0:04       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  0:13         ` david
2009-02-26  0:20           ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  2:50     ` Theodore Tso
2009-02-26  3:05       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  3:07       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-02-26  3:23         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-12-11  7:05           ` James Andrewartha
2009-12-11  7:26             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-11  7:32             ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  5:16         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 12:36           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-26 15:32           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-26 20:35             ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 21:02               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 14:51                 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-03-16 16:27                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 17:37                     ` Greg Freemyer
2009-03-16 18:11                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-22  1:20                         ` Bill Davidsen
2009-03-18 14:33                   ` James Bottomley
2009-02-26 18:22 ` hdparm-9.12 released Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090226030735.GA16891@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).