From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karel Zak Subject: Re: ATA support for 4k sector size Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:43:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20090226124339.GA10548@nb.net.home> References: <1235600698-6446-1-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <49A5CBF7.9000501@zytor.com> <49A5D55A.9080402@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:46753 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476AbZBZMnt (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:43:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49A5D55A.9080402@zytor.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Matthew Wilcox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sandeen@redhat.com On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:33:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > virtually every partition table format contains a sector size > dependency Is it true that "every partition table format"? I see in fs/partitions/ that only ibm.c and msdos.c care about a sector size. It seems that the others formats are based on 512 sectors only. Karel -- Karel Zak