From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] ide: flags query macros Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:21:07 +0100 Message-ID: <200902270921.08182.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <1234699692-9452-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> <200902262235.58796.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090227063822.GA26358@gollum.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.218.178]:46720 "EHLO mail-bw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752126AbZB0IUK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:20:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090227063822.GA26358@gollum.tnic> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: petkovbb@gmail.com Cc: Sam Ravnborg , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 27 February 2009, Borislav Petkov wrote: [...] > > BTW you may want to delay this patch after 2.6.30 as things should > > become much more peaceful then. > > What exactly is the timeframe here? Do you want to have the updated Timeframe for 2.6.30 [1] or things becoming more peaceful [2]? [1] We're in -rc6 so it is probably two-three more weeks before -final (then we have two weeks of merge window for draining ide tree queue). [2] I think that it will happen once we finish unification of ATAPI support. > version for the 2.6.31 merge window? That would be ideal from my POV. Thanks, Bart