From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
To: Phil Sutter <n0-1@freewrt.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>,
jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata-rb532-cf: platform_get_irq() failure ignored
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:41:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903131541.46648.florian@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090306164318.GF23767@nuty.nwl.cc>
Hi,
Le Friday 06 March 2009 17:43:18 Phil Sutter, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:23:22AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Roel Kluin wrote:
> > >------------------------------>8-------------8<-------------------------
> > >-------- platform_get_irq() can return -ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an
> > > unsigned int, it
> > >does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> > >---
> > >diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
> > >index ebfcda2..fe8178c 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
> > >@@ -173,11 +173,12 @@ static __devinit int
> > > rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > >- irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > >- if (irq <= 0) {
> > >+ ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > >+ if (ret <= 0) {
> > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ resource found\n");
> > > return -ENOENT;
> > > }
> > >+ irq = ret;
> > >
> > > gpio = irq_to_gpio(irq);
> >
> > ACK from Phil or Florian?
>
> That's fine for me, though I didn't test it (I managed to break my
> build-machine somehow, in an attempt to having the mainboard properly
> grounded).
>
> One could simplify the patch by making the variable 'irq' be signed
> instead of unsigned. This would also prevent "abusing" the variable
> 'ret'. What do you think?
I agree with this proposal, abusing the ret value is not that good. What about the patch below :
--
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pata-rb532-cf: platform_get_irq() failure ignored
platform_get_irq() can return -ENXIO, but since 'irq' is an
unsigned int, it does not show when the IRQ resource wasn't found.
Make irq an int so that we can use a single variable to test the
platform_get_irq() return value.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <n0-1@freewrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
--
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
index ebfcda2..da05518 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void rb532_pata_setup_ports(struct ata_host *ah)
static __devinit int rb532_pata_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- unsigned int irq;
+ int irq;
int gpio;
struct resource *res;
struct ata_host *ah;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-13 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-03 13:04 [PATCH] pata-rb532-cf: platform_get_irq() failure ignored Roel Kluin
2009-03-05 12:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-06 16:43 ` Phil Sutter
2009-03-13 14:41 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2009-03-14 0:51 ` Phil Sutter
2009-03-25 2:16 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903131541.46648.florian@openwrt.org \
--to=florian@openwrt.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=n0-1@freewrt.org \
--cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).