From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: 2.6.29 regression: ATA bus errors on resume Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:30:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20090327153044.3234722d@infradead.org> References: <49CD24BC.8040303@devnull.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38458 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752145AbZC0W3b (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:29:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49CD24BC.8040303@devnull.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Niel Lambrechts Cc: "linux.kernel" , James Bottomley , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux IDE mailing list , Jeff Garzik On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:10:52 +0200 Niel Lambrechts wrote: > I'm seeing some dubious looking ATA messages even on 2.6.28.9-pae, > although with all the 2.6.28 variants I used s2disk/resume has always > worked. I was wondering if these "errors" perhaps play more of a role > in 2.6.29, perhaps due to the async. changes that was mentioned? unless you actively enabled this via a kernel command line option there are no async changes in 2.6.29 in terms of behavior. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org