From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] tx4939ide: remove wmb() Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:18:52 +0200 Message-ID: <200904022118.52909.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <1238516136-15852-1-git-send-email-anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:46047 "EHLO mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761155AbZDBTgk (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:36:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Grundler Cc: Atsushi Nemoto , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > * define CHECK_DMA_MASK > > * remove use of wmb() > > > > Suggested-by: Grant Grundler > > Thank you for the attribution! > > But I think proper header would be: > Reported-by: Grant Grundler > > But in this case, since i've looked at the code and am under the > illusion I understand it, I'm comfortable with: > Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler Well, you can have both! ;)