From: "Leslie Rhorer" <lrhorer@satx.rr.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Odd RAID failure
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:34:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090411013434.TGVC5844.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@Leslie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DF7B4D.5080109@kernel.org>
> >>> If you can bear with slower operation, keeping issuing sync repeatedly
> >>> (ie. something like while true; do sync; sleep 1; done) and see how
> >>> the behavior changes might shed some light on what's going on too.
> >> I wouldn't expect it to have any diagnostic value, really. The sync
> >> command
> >> locks up just like every other disk I/O when the event occurs.
> >
> > I tried this and it doesn't seem to have made a difference. Neither
> does
> > using noop as the scheduler.
>
> Hmm... yeah, I was mostly thinking about ext3 for this and the next
> suggestion, which often has large latency when flushing its journal to
> disk. I suppose the next stop is trying another filesystem?
Well, I thought of that, of course. With over 6T of data, that means taking
the array down (mostly) for more than 3 days. 'Not a propect I cherish,
especially since it measn most of the data will then only exost on the
backup system, and over a period of 3 days there are a lot of opportunities
to lose the backup system , especially since it is JBOD. Indeed, the last
time I re-formatted the RAID array, the backup system did fail. The
motherboard shorted and took the power supply with it. Fortunately, I was
able to recover the backup system and only lost a few files.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-11 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-04 17:32 Odd RAID failure Lelsie Rhorer
2009-04-09 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-09 18:42 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-04-09 20:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-10 2:26 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-10 4:43 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-10 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-11 1:34 ` Leslie Rhorer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090411013434.TGVC5844.cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com@Leslie \
--to=lrhorer@satx.rr.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox