linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	rwheeler@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de,
	dgilbert@interlog.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 of 8] sd: Detect non-rotational devices
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:16:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423141644.GP1926@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240495814.3514.8.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:10:13PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> I'm with Jeff on this one.  We had an identically similar problem with
> REPORT LUNS, which, today is the basis of SCSI discovery.

Yes, REPORT LUNS is quite essential.

It's not exactly in the same category as reporting device form factor
and rotational speed.  If REPORT LUNS is wrong, we're in really deep
trouble.  If device form factr is wrong ... umm ... nothing much happens.
If rotational speed is wrong, we might have a suboptimal IO pattern.
It's also fixable by udev.

The current check for is_ssd (that doesn't check the version) was put
in for 2.6.27.  It doesn't appear to have caused any trouble.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23  5:29 [PATCH 0 of 8] I/O topology patch kit Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] block: Export I/O topology for block devices and partitions Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 10:51   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 11:55       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 13:22         ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 13:30           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 13:17     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 18:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 18:26       ` Ric Wheeler
2009-04-23 18:44         ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 18:34       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] MD: Use new topology calls to indicate alignment and I/O sizes Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] sd: Physical block size and alignment support Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 16:37   ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 18:25     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 18:44       ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-04-23 19:02         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] sd: Detect non-rotational devices Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 10:52   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:09     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 11:13       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 11:22         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 11:38       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 11:58         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 12:03           ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 13:16         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 13:33           ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 14:10             ` James Bottomley
2009-04-23 14:16               ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-04-23 14:39                 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 17:25                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 17:37                     ` James Bottomley
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] sd: Block limits VPD support Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] scsi_debug: Add support for physical block exponent and alignment Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23  5:29 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] libata: Report disk alignment and physical block size Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-23 13:46   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-23 14:05     ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090423141644.GP1926@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).