linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: "João Ramos" <joao.ramos@inov.pt>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: EP93xx PIO IDE driver proposal
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:41:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905121841.32576.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A082621.7030008@inov.pt>

On Monday 11 May 2009 15:20:33 João Ramos wrote:
> 
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> Well, yes.  Though I hoped that you would at least give a try to fixing
> >>> IDE core to program PIO0 initially for all host drivers that implement
> >>> ->set_pio_mode method...
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> Sorry, I didn't noticed your hint... Sure, I can give it a try ;-)
> >> Maybe with a little help, but I can try. You mean, when the host driver 
> >> is registered (ide_host_register, or ide_host_add that later calls 
> >> ide_host_register), maybe in the 'ide_init_port' method (sorry, I need 
> >> some guidance here...) check if the 'set_pio_mode' method is 
> >> implemented, and after initializing each port (d->init_hwif(hwif)) 
> >> default it to PIO Mode 0, calling set_pio_mode method.
> >>     
> >
> > ide_init_port() seems OK but I think that ide_port_init_devices()
> > [it is called after ide_init_port()] would be a bit safer and more
> > flexible (some host drivers may also require special ->init_dev
> > setup first) and the check for ->set_pio_mode method presence can
> > be done just before actually using the method, i.e.
> >
> > 	const struct ide_port_ops *port_ops = hwif->port_ops;
> >
> > 	if (port_ops && port_ops->set_pio_mode)
> > 		port_ops->set_pio_mode(...)
> >
> >   
> 
> Ok, so the patch for this is attached in this e-mail.
> 
> Please confirm and make your comments.

--- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
@@ -1031,6 +1031,13 @@ static void ide_port_init_devices(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
 
 		if (port_ops && port_ops->init_dev)
 			port_ops->init_dev(drive);
+
+		/*
+		 * if driver uses PIO mode, default to PIO Mode 0 before we
+		 * figure out the most suited mode for the attached device
+		 */
+		if (port_ops && port_ops->set_pio_mode)
+			port_ops->set_pio_mode(drive, 0);
 	}
 }
 
Looks good but please move this into a separate ide_port_for_each_dev()
loop (some host drivers require full initial setup of both devices on
the port before ->set_pio_mode can be called).

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-12 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <49CCD7C4.8000207@inov.pt>
     [not found] ` <49CFDD8F.1030306@bluewatersys.com>
     [not found]   ` <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909014E2E09@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com>
     [not found]     ` <49D0CAE4.9090306@inov.pt>
2009-03-30 15:34       ` EP93xx PIO IDE driver proposal Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-04 11:24         ` João Ramos
2009-05-05 12:04           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-06 14:17             ` João Ramos
2009-05-06 17:05               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-07  9:36                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 11:01                   ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 13:53                   ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 15:33                     ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 12:04                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 12:16                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 12:40                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 13:30                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 14:09                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 17:28                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 18:02                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 18:16                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-08 18:55                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-08 20:24                                 ` joao.ramos
2009-05-08 21:01                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 22:07                                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-11 11:10                                       ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:49                                         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-12 17:23                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-13 11:01                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-17 15:20                                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-22 17:52                                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-13 14:18                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-14 19:44                                               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-15 17:01                                                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-17 16:16                                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-18 13:49                                                     ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 13:06                                                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 13:20                                                         ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 13:56                                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-19 14:05                                                             ` João Ramos
2009-05-19 15:50                                                               ` João Ramos
2009-06-06 15:26                                                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-06-22 10:01                                                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-14 16:30                                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-14 16:36                                               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-14 18:58                                                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-11 13:20                                 ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:41                                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-05-12 16:57                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-12 16:01                           ` João Ramos
2009-05-12 16:30                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-12 16:45                               ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 16:52                   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 22:09                     ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 22:31                       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 22:51                         ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 23:01                           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-07 23:12                             ` Ryan Mallon
2009-05-07 23:32                               ` João Ramos
2009-05-07 23:58                                 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2009-05-08 11:23                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-05-08 12:47                     ` João Ramos
     [not found]       ` <49D12669.4030207@bluewatersys.com>
2009-03-31 10:36         ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905121841.32576.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=joao.ramos@inov.pt \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).