From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15 v2] ide-atapi: remove pc->buf and misc cleanups Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 21:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: <200905162107.38332.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <1242364293-29223-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:63422 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755756AbZEPTPl (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 15:15:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1242364293-29223-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Jens Axboe Hi, On Friday 15 May 2009 07:11:18 Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > this is the newest respin of the current patchset with all issues from > the previous review round fixed: > > - 0003: fixed checkpatch issues > > - 0005: documented additional change in the commit message > > - 0009: converted to using bio_data() helper; pushed pc->buf removal to #12; > moved unrelated changes to 0010 > > - 0014: updated/fixed checkpatch issues Thanks. > It also got rebased ontop of block/for-2.6.31 after Tejun's stuff got merged. I would love to merge it but I'm hitting merge conflicts... I can pull tj/block-peek-fetch into for-next but not block/for-2.6.31... tj's top commit: author Tejun Heo Fri, 8 May 2009 23:45:23 +0000 (08:45 +0900) committer Tejun Heo Fri, 8 May 2009 23:45:23 +0000 (08:45 +0900) commit 18c551bb4944dec0ce2c0a854b6694ed39ab58f6 tree a2a59fd27626e930809a20546c0c02e1df498056 parent 88fd264e94d01b23339ce614be9141eb2db98e10 corresponding blocks's commit: author Tejun Heo Fri, 8 May 2009 02:54:16 +0000 (11:54 +0900) committer Jens Axboe Mon, 11 May 2009 07:52:18 +0000 (09:52 +0200) commit 9934c8c04561413609d2bc38c6b9f268cba774a4 tree 30dd8f7be54f9b2e03094de9cd03b6a9ee2909cd parent 2343046826a8ca426b07601d9593ee046c298b68 Looking at creation dates I suspect that somewhere along the way something was rebased? One quick temporary solution would be to recreate bp/pc-remove-buf on top of tj/block-peek-fetch...