From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED2 block#for-2.6.31 2/3] block: set rq->resid_len to blk_rq_bytes() on issue Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:17:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20090519091724.GT4140@kernel.dk> References: <4A0D86DB.9000203@kernel.org> <4A0D87D2.7090806@gmail.com> <4A0E0650.1020500@gmail.com> <4A0FFD7E.8050607@gmail.com> <20090518124919.GK4140@kernel.dk> <4A127864.8090701@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A127864.8090701@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: James Bottomley , Boaz Harrosh , Linux Kernel , linux-scsi , IDE/ATA development list , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Borislav Petkov , Pete Zaitcev , Sergei Shtylyov , Eric Moore , "Darrick J. Wong" List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19 2009, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jens. > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > Tejun, you have to stop replying with updated patches in an existing > > thread. It's virtually impossible to sort the resulting mess into > > patches worth applying. > > Heh.. yeah, I usually post minor updates as UPDATED patches for review > then repost the whole series after accumulating some of them. This > patchset's size was on the borderline for proper patchset and I was > feeling lazy. Sorry about that. Will repost. Thanks, appreciated :-) -- Jens Axboe