linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] pdc202xx_old: fix resetproc() method
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 00:07:12 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905300007.13113.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> (raw)

pdc202xx_reset() calls pdc202xx_reset_host() twice, for both channels, while
that function actually twiddles the single, shared software reset bit -- the
net effect is a duplicated reset and horrendous 4 second delay happening not
only on a channel reset but also when dma_lost_irq() and dma_clear() methods
are called.  Fold pdc202xx_reset_host() into pdc202xx_reset(), fix printk(),
and move it before the actual reset...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

---
The patch is against the ide-2.6.git master branch...

Bart, I know you have the docs... from the now removed source code I was able
to figure out that the bit in question most probably drives RST- signal on both
channels (it seems to require re-tuning drives on both channels which we are
currently not doing). If I'm right, why the hell we're twiddling it on a normal
SRST reset, and what's worse on an interrupt timeout conditions? Anyway, it's
hardly a good idea to reset both channels when you only have problem with only
one of them, and I don't see any justification to doing that... So maybe this
patch should've actually wiped out that whole reset insanity for good?..

 drivers/ide/pdc202xx_old.c |   19 +++++--------------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Index: ide-2.6/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_old.c
===================================================================
--- ide-2.6.orig/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_old.c
+++ ide-2.6/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_old.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /*
  *  Copyright (C) 1998-2002		Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
- *  Copyright (C) 2006-2007		MontaVista Software, Inc.
+ *  Copyright (C) 2006-2007, 2009	MontaVista Software, Inc.
  *  Copyright (C) 2007			Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  *
  *  Portions Copyright (C) 1999 Promise Technology, Inc.
@@ -227,28 +227,19 @@ somebody_else:
 	return (dma_stat & 4) == 4;	/* return 1 if INTR asserted */
 }
 
-static void pdc202xx_reset_host (ide_hwif_t *hwif)
+static void pdc202xx_reset(ide_drive_t *drive)
 {
+	ide_hwif_t *hwif	= drive->hwif;
 	unsigned long high_16	= hwif->extra_base - 16;
 	u8 udma_speed_flag	= inb(high_16 | 0x001f);
 
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "PDC202xx: software reset...\n");
+
 	outb(udma_speed_flag | 0x10, high_16 | 0x001f);
 	mdelay(100);
 	outb(udma_speed_flag & ~0x10, high_16 | 0x001f);
 	mdelay(2000);	/* 2 seconds ?! */
 
-	printk(KERN_WARNING "PDC202XX: %s channel reset.\n",
-		hwif->channel ? "Secondary" : "Primary");
-}
-
-static void pdc202xx_reset (ide_drive_t *drive)
-{
-	ide_hwif_t *hwif	= drive->hwif;
-	ide_hwif_t *mate	= hwif->mate;
-
-	pdc202xx_reset_host(hwif);
-	pdc202xx_reset_host(mate);
-
 	ide_set_max_pio(drive);
 }
 


             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-29 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-29 20:07 Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2009-05-29 21:41 ` [PATCH] pdc202xx_old: fix resetproc() method Alan Cox
2009-05-31 14:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-03 17:58   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-06-07 11:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905300007.13113.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).