From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] partitions/ide: improve Host Protected Area handling Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:34:54 +0200 Message-ID: <200905311735.01244.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20090531143911.7164.26834.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090531152403.GA26987@ub> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:34517 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753664AbZEaPaQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 11:30:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090531152403.GA26987@ub> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Andries E. Brouwer" Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock , Al Viro , Frans Pop On Sunday 31 May 2009 17:24:03 Andries E. Brouwer wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 04:39:11PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > [HPA stuff deleted] > > Hi Bartlomiej, > > Apart from HPA one also has DCO, which functions rather similarly. > (I have not checked whether the current kernel knows anything about DCO.) > Have you thought about DCO? > Probably the kernel should by default not touch any such setting. > Maybe it should be reported? > A user space utility might change this setting - thus a disk can change size. We leave DCO handling entirely to user-space currently.