From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: cmd64x: irq 14: nobody cared - system is dreadfully slow Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:34:22 +0200 Message-ID: <200906220034.22430.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200906202352.33894.elendil@planet.nl> <200906211515.56804.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090621.141950.160759111.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090621.141950.160759111.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: elendil@planet.nl, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 21 June 2009 23:19:50 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:15:56 +0200 > > > On Sunday 21 June 2009 02:19:45 David Miller wrote: > >> I wonder how much testing this commit received... > > > > Too less, any help with improving testing coverage is welcomed > > (this was just a tiny part of very large rework which has been tested > > and has been sitting in linux-next for weeks before push to Linus). > > Maybe you should leave the driver alone until you can get affirmative > testing results from people who have the hardware?!?!? :-/ > > And in leiu of that, simply leave it alone until such testing can > actually be performed. Can't wait forever... > That's why all the IDE drivers are constantly breaking on sparc. URLs to bug-reports please.. or it didn't happened.. > The IDE layer is more than legacy at this point, so if you aren't > fixing bugs (those reported by users and the fix for which can > be absolutely tested), just leave it be. Interesting, we have been steadily adding new hardware support (there is another driver for embedded hardware pending inclusion).. If you wanted to run IDE-stale tree I would have been more than happy to help you with it by cc:ing you on bugfix patches. > So this totally eliminates any argument you may have about necessary > "infrastructure" changes that might be blocked by not being able to > make these kinds modifications to drivers for devices you can't even > test. I'm really tired of this kind of hostility towards IDE changes and I also don't have time for such unproductive discussions. Lets get over this quickly, since you seem to have such a great insight into running IDE layer here is a little proposition.. ACK? [ If not than can we please get back with the program? ] --- MAINTAINERS | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: b/MAINTAINERS =================================================================== --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -2783,10 +2783,9 @@ S: Supported F: drivers/scsi/ips.* IDE SUBSYSTEM -P: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -M: bzolnier@gmail.com +P: David S. Miller +M: davem@davemloft.net L: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org -T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/ide-2.6.git S: Maintained F: Documentation/ide/ F: drivers/ide/