From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: Allow hosts to be flagged as hotpluggable Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:45:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20090716144536.GB14345@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1247701438-18266-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <4A5F3975.70503@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090716143828.GB13924@srcf.ucam.org> <1247755399.6606.4.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:38249 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757597AbZGPOpl (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:45:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1247755399.6606.4.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Stefan Richter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43:19PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:38 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Exactly. > > OK, so if this is only in relation to SATA power management, put it in > libata and call it something like pm_capable. That way we don't have to > work out what to do with it for the rest of SCSI. I have vague memories of this coming up before and it being suggested that it should be done at the SCSI layer instead, but I can't find that now. Doing it entirely in libata certainly isn't a problem. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org