From: Allan Wind <allan_wind@lifeintegrity.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:06:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090803160629.GA2011@lifeintegrity.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249310093.3943.11.camel@mulgrave.site>
On 2009-08-03T09:34:53, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:08 -0400, Allan Wind wrote:
> >
> > The above complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly
> > 19566 sectors greater than the size of the raid array according
> > to parted. In other words it appears to be an access to the last
> > sector of the array.
>
> If it's a read beyond the end of a partition, then it's possible it got
> rejected in the partition checking logic before ever reaching the I/O
> controller (which would explain why no messages from the fusion in the
> log).
>
> However, I don't think the analysis is correct. Parted says
>
>
> > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
> > 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub
> > 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid
>
> So the absolute sector number 3907028974 is within partition 2.
I was actually trying to make a different point. Namely that it
was curious that the error message complains about sector
3907028974 which is exactly the size of the array + 19566, or in
other words 1 sector past the end of array:
/dev/sdb2
start: 19566
end: 3907029134
size: 3907029134 - 19566 + 1 = 3907009568
/dev/md0
start: 0
end: 3907009407
size: 3907009407 - 0 + 1 = 3907009408
If dm maps linear to the disk sectors:
dm /dev/sdb2
0 19566
1 19567
...
3907009406 3907028972
3907009407 3907028973
What dm sector would map to physical sector 3907028974?
/Allan
--
Allan Wind
Life Integrity, LLC
<http://lifeintegrity.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 6:03 LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key Allan Wind
2009-07-29 19:43 ` Robert Hancock
2009-07-29 20:07 ` Allan Wind
2009-07-29 23:04 ` Robert Hancock
2009-07-31 18:40 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 5:08 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-03 16:06 ` Allan Wind [this message]
2009-08-03 16:15 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-26 21:17 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-11 6:20 ` Jeppe Oland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090803160629.GA2011@lifeintegrity.com \
--to=allan_wind@lifeintegrity.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).