* IDE -next tree
@ 2009-08-08 4:37 David Miller
2009-08-08 4:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-08-08 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfr; +Cc: linux-next, linux-ide
Stephen, please add:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-next-2.6.git
to your -next tree.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: IDE -next tree
2009-08-08 4:37 IDE -next tree David Miller
@ 2009-08-08 4:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-08 12:45 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-08 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-next, linux-ide
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:37:13 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Stephen, please add:
>
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-next-2.6.git
>
> to your -next tree.
So does that mean that the current ide tree
(master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6.git) should
become ide-current (i.e. it contains bug fixes for the current release)?
Or should I just drop it?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: IDE -next tree
2009-08-08 4:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-08-08 12:45 ` David Miller
2009-08-08 15:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-08-08 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfr; +Cc: linux-next, linux-ide
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:41:40 +1000
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:37:13 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> Stephen, please add:
>>
>> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-next-2.6.git
>>
>> to your -next tree.
>
> So does that mean that the current ide tree
> (master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6.git) should
> become ide-current (i.e. it contains bug fixes for the current release)?
That's right.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: IDE -next tree
2009-08-08 12:45 ` David Miller
@ 2009-08-08 15:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-08 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-next, linux-ide
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 575 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:45:12 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:41:40 +1000
>
> >
> > So does that mean that the current ide tree
> > (master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-2.6.git) should
> > become ide-current (i.e. it contains bug fixes for the current release)?
>
> That's right.
OK, it will be that way starting on Monday.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-08 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-08 4:37 IDE -next tree David Miller
2009-08-08 4:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-08 12:45 ` David Miller
2009-08-08 15:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).