From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200 Message-ID: <200908071927.36367.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200907011835.27586.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200908071355.21648.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090807.090158.45976865.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090807.090158.45976865.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 August 2009 18:01:58 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:55:21 +0200 > > > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 22:47:29 David Miller wrote: > >> Will get to it before the end of the weekend. > >> > >> If I fail or abort, I'll integrate your version of the fix Bart, don't > >> worry :) > > > > Not that I'm worried but just out of curiosity.. > > > > Could you please tell me which week/month/year are we talking about here? > > I became busier than I expected here in New York :-) I would say that this is a bit unprofessional attitude which normally is not accepted by PNAELV people.. :-) > Actually both patches #4 and #5 are in my ide-next-2.6 tree, I just > need to publish it out to kernel.org and update the patchwork status > on these patches. Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public tree to hold future IDE changes? If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP.