From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "Revert "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during probe if possible"" Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20091006.154120.153174904.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200910070027.45678.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37485 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932887AbZJFWlZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:41:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200910070027.45678.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: bzolnier@gmail.com Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, joao.ramos@inov.pt, david@fries.net, d.stussy@yahoo.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:27:45 +0200 > The root cause of reported system hangs was (now fixed) sis5513 bug > and not "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during probe if possible" change > (commit 6029336426a2b43e4bc6f4a84be8789a047d139e) so the revert was > incorrect (it simply replaced one regression with the other one). What is this older "regression" fixed by the PIO-0 change? You're not explaining it and neither does the commit message for the PIO-0 change. Please, fill us in :-)