From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Serialize CMD643 and CMD646 to fix a hardware bug with SSD Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20091022.040049.83738097.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200910212139.24675.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091021.174155.44894825.davem@davemloft.net> <200910221144.04471.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59341 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753116AbZJVLA0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:00:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200910221144.04471.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: bzolnier@gmail.com Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, elendil@planet.nl From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:44:04 +0200 > We are through this the second time and you're still not willing > neither to listen nor to read the code. I can understand why you might attribute malice and ignorance to my actions by default, but it doesn't apply here. > We always did serialization for CMD646, we just used hwif->chipset > == ide_cmd646 (without using IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE flag): I fully acknowledge that we always serialized, sorry for not being explicit. I was just showing where the serialize IRQ flag got added (and again, it was a correct change).