From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Serialize CMD643 and CMD646 to fix a hardware bug with SSD Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20091024.043104.143081386.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200910212139.24675.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091021.174155.44894825.davem@davemloft.net> <200910241328.40965.elendil@planet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57519 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753140AbZJXLal (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:30:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200910241328.40965.elendil@planet.nl> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: elendil@planet.nl Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org From: Frans Pop Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:28:39 +0200 > On Thursday 22 October 2009, David Miller wrote: >> The most conservative thing to do is to set the flag as >> is done by mpatocka's patch but I'd like Frans to regression >> test that on his ultra5. >> >> Frans can you do that? > > Sure, if you send me the patch (or a link to it). May take a few days. It's here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/36615/ Also, all pending IDE patches can always be found at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ide/list/ > Also, is it still needed given the whole discussion that happened after > this mail? Yes, I still fully intend to apply mpatocka's patch, as-is.