From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: remove experimental tag on PATA drivers
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:15:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911131715.24377.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFCC0D4.9020708@gmail.com>
On Friday 13 November 2009 03:13:40 Robert Hancock wrote:
> Remove the experimental tag on Parallel ATA drivers. Though some of the
> individual PATA drivers are still marked as experimental, as a group they can
> hardly be considered to be, given they've been used in various distros for some
> time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Fine but please update status of following host drivers that were
marked as "stable" prematurely by commit e3389cb first:
PATA_PDC_OLD: needs to be marked as EXPERIMENTAL (or just BROKEN)
- known reliability problems with UDMA
PATA_ALI: EXPERIMENTAL
- ATAPI DMA is still broken
PATA_CMD64X: EXPERIMENTAL
- potential data corruption issues remains unfixed for CMD64[3,6]
PATA_SIS: EXPERIMENTAL
- missing MWDMA support on newer controllers
They are all old & known problems and not present in
[ "old", "deprecated", "legacy" ] counterparts.
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> index f2df6e2..33133c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> #
>
> menuconfig ATA
> - tristate "Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA (experimental) drivers"
> + tristate "Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers"
> depends on HAS_IOMEM
> depends on BLOCK
> depends on !(M32R || M68K) || BROKEN
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 2:13 [PATCH] libata: remove experimental tag on PATA drivers Robert Hancock
2009-11-13 11:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-13 16:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-11-13 18:25 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-13 19:39 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-13 21:30 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-13 22:17 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-13 22:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-13 22:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 0:03 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-13 21:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-11-13 22:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-13 22:26 ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2009-11-13 23:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 0:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 0:15 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-14 1:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 16:04 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-14 16:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 2:29 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-14 2:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 12:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-17 3:18 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911131715.24377.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).