From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't use UDMA on VIA UDMA33 controller with Transcend SSD Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:32:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091118.093233.83428970.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20091117.043002.224755438.davem@davemloft.net> <20091118172258.59894130@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45488 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757667AbZKRRcQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:32:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091118172258.59894130@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Cox Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:22:58 +0000 >> Transcend makes various versions of their SSDs and all begin with TS. You >> can assume that Transcend SSDs with different capacity or format won't >> work too because they likely use the same controller. The naming is this: > > You don't want to assume that because then you will never find out if > there is no problem. Agreed. And if Alan's patch for the ATA layer is going to use an exact string match, which it is, and we should do the same in the IDE layer to be consistent.