From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 86/86] libata: add private driver field to struct ata_device Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:02:44 +0100 Message-ID: <200911251902.45049.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20091125170218.5446.13513.sendpatchset@localhost> <20091125171248.5446.22482.sendpatchset@localhost> <20091125175650.64de8a10@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:59566 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753155AbZKYSD0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:03:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091125175650.64de8a10@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 25 November 2009 06:56:50 pm Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:12:48 +0100 > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > Subject: [PATCH] libata: add private driver field to struct ata_device > > > > This brings struct ata_device in-line with struct ata_{port,host}. > > Do we need it for anything yet - whoever first needs it can add it, > otherwise its just waste. There is a new driver using it (to be posted later) and it makes libata API more coherent for driver developers.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz