From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 14583] SSD system stall, HSM Violation
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 02:40:51 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912090240.nB92epHx008898@demeter.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14583-11633@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14583
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hancockrwd@gmail.com
--- Comment #25 from Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> 2009-12-09 02:40:49 ---
It looks like most of these bug reports indicate BMDMA status 0x04 or 0x64 when
the timeout occurs, indicating that the controller should be asserting an
interrupt and the BMDMA transfer is not or is no longer active. But the device
registers indicate DRQ is asserted, indicating the device wants to transfer
more data. It looks like this is why libata reports an HSM violation.
The amount of data drained indicates that no data was actually transferred (I
notice there's a bug that causes the amount of data reported as drained to be
half the actual amount, I'll submit a patch for that). I don't see a reason for
the device to generate an interrupt at this point. Thus I tend to suspect that
the cause is a bug in the device.
As far as why an interrupt is shown as generated but doesn't actually get
received, I'm not sure. Maybe the controller doesn't propagate the interrupt if
the state machine doesn't say it should be getting one? DRQ + interrupt
asserted certainly doesn't seem like a combination that should happen.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 6:24 [Bug 14583] New: SSD system stall, HSM Violation bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 6:24 ` [Bug 14583] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 6:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 6:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 6:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 6:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-12 4:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-12 4:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-12 4:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-12 5:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-12 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-13 5:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-13 5:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-18 5:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-18 6:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-18 7:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-25 10:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-25 10:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-25 10:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-26 4:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-26 4:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-06 23:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-06 23:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-08 6:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-09 2:40 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2009-12-09 6:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-10 0:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-10 6:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-10 14:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-10 14:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-10 23:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 16:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 18:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 20:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-15 0:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-15 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-15 0:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-15 14:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-15 11:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-15 14:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-16 15:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-18 8:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-18 8:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-18 8:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-18 9:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-18 9:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-02-03 6:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912090240.nB92epHx008898@demeter.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).