From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:23:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20100223122320.GZ1025@kernel.dk> References: <201002222224.35860.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20100223062324.GI1025@kernel.dk> <201002231317.01128.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:39910 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998Ab0BWMXW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:23:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002231317.01128.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Benjamin S." On Tue, Feb 23 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means > > > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening > > > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding > > > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees > > > > > > > > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance. > > > > > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree > > > performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not > > > of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ] > > > > What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of > > political tirades? > > I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus' > tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix > for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my > personal perspective in waiting for such long time.. It'll go into 2.6.33, I already prepared an updated for-linus branch this morning and will send it out later today. -- Jens Axboe