From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc2 breaks via82cxxx Host Protected Area
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20100327.074434.193717071.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4BAD5472.9050303@garzik.org>
	<20100327020934.GA8224@spacedout.fries.net>
	<201003271119.53757.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50618
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752931Ab0C0OoM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:44:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201003271119.53757.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: david@fries.net, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:19:53 +0100

> The commit itself may also have a problem but since it was _never_ in
> linux-next tree it never saw a wider upstream testing.

This is not true Bart.

My ide-2.6 and ide-next-2.6 trees are both included in
linux-next   And if they are not, that needs to be fixed
because they very much are intended to be.

In any event, you wrote a patch which broke something and
if you're not willing to work on a fix I have no choice
but to simply revert.