From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: WARNINGs because of ide-proc handling
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:56:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831205605.GA23636@pengutronix.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1548 bytes --]
Hello,
I get the following warning (and some similar ones) on my laptop running
2.6.36-rc3 when removing a CF card via pcmcia:
[ 1087.602129] WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:816 remove_proc_entry+0x185/0x1d0()
[ 1087.602137] Hardware name: Amilo M14255
[ 1087.602142] name 'cache'
...
It turned out that none of the entries in ide_disk_proc[] gets created when
inserting the card, so trying to remove them triggers this warning. Adding
some debug printouts
========
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-proc.c b/drivers/ide/ide-proc.c
index a3133d7..5016a54 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-proc.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-proc.c
@@ -650,6 +651,7 @@ void ide_proc_register_driver(ide_drive_t *drive, struct ide_driver *driver)
drive->settings = driver->proc_devsets(drive);
mutex_unlock(&ide_setting_mtx);
+ printk(KERN_INFO "*** wsa: %s - %p - %d\n", driver->proc_entries(drive)->name, drive->proc, (drive->media == ide_disk));
ide_add_proc_entries(drive->proc, driver->proc_entries(drive), drive);
}
========
results in:
[ 9.040157] *** wsa: cache - (null) - 1
This shows that the path needed for those proc-entries does not exist at this
moment (pointer is null). So the callchain for creating all the proc-entries
seems to be disordered? The entries are present for my hard-disk, though.
Kind regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2010-08-31 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 20:56 Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-09-02 2:33 ` WARNINGs because of ide-proc handling David Miller
2010-09-02 21:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-02 22:14 ` David Miller
2010-09-03 5:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-03 12:34 ` David Miller
2010-09-03 14:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-09-03 14:35 ` David Miller
2010-09-03 14:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-03 18:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-14 4:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100831205605.GA23636@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).