From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: WARNINGs because of ide-proc handling Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:21:38 +0200 Message-ID: <201009031621.38693.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20100902212839.GA20070@pengutronix.de> <20100903055328.GA11991@pengutronix.de> <20100903.053437.68134749.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:43303 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753494Ab0ICOWP (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:22:15 -0400 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so1537749bwz.19 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100903.053437.68134749.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: w.sang@pengutronix.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Friday 03 September 2010 02:34:37 pm David Miller wrote: > From: Wolfram Sang > Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:53:28 +0200 > > > > >> Thanks for your analysis and suggested patch, I'll take a look at this. > > > > Thanks for your help. If we can't find something, I'll just do a bisect this > > weekend. > > Frankly, at this point, I'm beginning suspect that the procfs stuff > simply never warned at some point in the past and that the IDE > code has had this problem for a while. JFYI deprecated procfs stuff has been long gone from atang tree.. Thanks. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz