From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: PMP and SEMB messages to SEP Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:24:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20110117172415.GK27123@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20110113192558.GE16039@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20110114142018.GA978@htj.dyndns.org> <20110114165957.GH16039@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20110114170407.GE978@htj.dyndns.org> <20110114173759.GI16039@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20110117154042.GG27123@htj.dyndns.org> <1295281131.3015.44.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110117171836.GI27123@htj.dyndns.org> <1295284906.3015.136.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295284906.3015.136.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Herbert Poetzl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:21:46AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > Expanders aren't SCSI devices either ... that means they don't appear as > visible to standard SCSI mechanisms like INQUIRY (SMP isn't a SCSI > protocol it's a SAS extension). They just appear as part of the > topology in the device tree. Ah, okay. Then, things would be much simpler. I was worrying about how it would map to SCSI layer including INQUIRY emulations and all those stuff. Thanks for the info. -- tejun