linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: WDC WD20EARS and 4k sector size
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:04:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110125030410.GA24024@MAIL.13thfloor.at> (raw)


I recently bought the WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB0 because it
was really cheap for a drive with 64 MB cache, and I
wanted to try out a 4k sector size disk ...

Now the drive performs quite well, is rather silent
and doesn't use much power or produce much heat, but
at first I didn't find anything in Linux indicating
that this drive would actually use 4k sectors.

To shorten things, I asked around on IRC, had a chat
with some other folks, found a jumper description on
the WD site talking about an 'Advanced Format' jumper
and finally contacted WD in a lengthy email thread.

The results of all this are:

 - the drive doesn't report 4k sectors at all, not
   even as physical sector size.

 - the 'Advanced Format' jumper shifts access to the
   the drive by one sector.

I did some tests to verify that, and I can confirm
the behaviour of the jumper in question with certain
benchmark tests (using dm and bonnie++) with and
without the jumper in place.

My question now is, how can I tell the kernel that
this drive actually has 4k physical sectors and that
it would be a smart thing to send requests in some 
kind of 4k I/O chunks?

Many thanks in advance,
Herbert

PS: if somebody is interested in the tests done to
verify the jumper, please let me know ...

             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-25  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-25  3:04 Herbert Poetzl [this message]
2011-01-25  3:15 ` WDC WD20EARS and 4k sector size Martin K. Petersen
2011-01-25  3:32   ` Herbert Poetzl
2011-01-25  3:40     ` Greg Freemyer
2011-01-25  3:52     ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-01-25  4:23       ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25  8:26         ` Michael Tokarev
2011-01-25 10:01     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25  4:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-25  4:21 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25  4:34   ` Herbert Poetzl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110125030410.GA24024@MAIL.13thfloor.at \
    --to=herbert@13thfloor.at \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).