From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] ATA : vortex86 : fix vortex86dx/sx hardware CRC bug. Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:43:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20111027084310.2b7da753@pyx> References: <1319602564-19162-1-git-send-email-paul.s.schilling@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [85.13.70.251] ([85.13.70.251]:63672 "EHLO localhost.localdomain" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752353Ab1J0Hxg (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:53:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1319602564-19162-1-git-send-email-paul.s.schilling@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Schilling Cc: Jeff Garzik , "David S. Miller" , Jesse Barnes , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:16:04 -0500 Paul Schilling wrote: > This fixes a DMA issue related to a CRC bug on > the RDC pata peripherial found on the vortex86sx and vortex86dx. What is the RDC erratum reference for this ? Also it seems to make no sense > static const struct ata_port_info info_rdc_11 = { > .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS, > .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4, > - .mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2, > + .mwdma_mask = 0, > + .udma_mask = 0, MWDMA is not part of the CRC hardware anyway Are you sure these newer variants are simply not using a different set of timing parameters thus showing bugs on your system ?