From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:57:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20111110135703.GA23609@elte.hu> References: <20111011201127.455df266dcbffb1d621f8576@canb.auug.org.au> <4E94A920.40503@xenotime.net> <4E987829.3080104@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E987829.3080104@xenotime.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Anton Vorontsov , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org * Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/11/2011 01:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> The linux-next tree is now available from > >> git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while > >> the kernel.org servers are unavailable. > >> > >> It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring). The > >> patch set is still absent, however. > >> > >> Changes since 20111007: > >> > >> Removed tree: ide (at the maintainer's request) > > > > > > drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c:55:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > [adding Author: Anton] > > Build error still present in linux-next of 20111014. This build failure regression report was ignored twice and then pushed upstream and is still unfixed a month after the initial report. Upstream now fails to build on like 25% of x86 configs. What's going on with this bug guys? Thanks, Ingo