From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ide/at91: use new introduce smc accessor Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:59:26 +0000 Message-ID: <201112091359.26439.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20111208150348.GD23884@game.jcrosoft.org> <1323357784-17555-3-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:53850 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562Ab1LIOCA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:02:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1323357784-17555-3-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Nicolas Ferre , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 December 2011, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > this will allow to use the pata_at91 on a single zImage > > J. > drivers/ide/at91_ide.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) The description doesn't match the file you are changing. Is there still a strong reason to keep using the at91_ide driver instead of migrating everybody to pata_at91 now? Arnd