Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ATA standard vs. speed
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:48:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120304144806.4bef0256@endymion.delvare> (raw)

Hi all,

After reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_ATA#Features_introduced_with_each_ATA_revision
it seemed clear to me that there was a direct relation between the
operating speed of a (P)ATA hard disk drive and the version of the ATA
standard it implemented. However I see the following in my kernel logs
on an old machine (kernel 2.6.34, Intel ICH5 controller):

ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xeff0 ctl 0xefe4 bmdma 0xef90 irq 18
ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xefa8 ctl 0xefe0 bmdma 0xef98 irq 18
ata2.00: HPA unlocked: 40018511 -> 40020624, native 40020624
ata2.00: ATA-6: Maxtor 52049H4, DAC10SC0, max UDMA/100
ata2.00: 40020624 sectors, multi 16: LBA 
ata1.00: HPA unlocked: 78175679 -> 78177792, native 78177792
ata1.00: ATA-5: MAXTOR 6L040J2, A93.0300, max UDMA/133
ata1.00: 78177792 sectors, multi 16: LBA 

While the second disk matches the wikipedia table (ATA-6 introduced
UDMA/100), the first one doesn't: UDMA/133 wasn't supposed to exist in
standard ATA-5.

Digging old logs, I also found this (same machine, same kernel,
different drive):

ata2.00: ATA-4: WDC WD102AA, 05.05B05, max UDMA/66

Here again, UDMA/66 wasn't supposed to exist in standard ATA-4.

Can anyone explain this mystery to me?

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

             reply	other threads:[~2012-03-04 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-04 13:48 Jean Delvare [this message]
2012-03-04 14:55 ` ATA standard vs. speed James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120304144806.4bef0256@endymion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox