From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ATA standard vs. speed
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:48:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120304144806.4bef0256@endymion.delvare> (raw)
Hi all,
After reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_ATA#Features_introduced_with_each_ATA_revision
it seemed clear to me that there was a direct relation between the
operating speed of a (P)ATA hard disk drive and the version of the ATA
standard it implemented. However I see the following in my kernel logs
on an old machine (kernel 2.6.34, Intel ICH5 controller):
ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xeff0 ctl 0xefe4 bmdma 0xef90 irq 18
ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xefa8 ctl 0xefe0 bmdma 0xef98 irq 18
ata2.00: HPA unlocked: 40018511 -> 40020624, native 40020624
ata2.00: ATA-6: Maxtor 52049H4, DAC10SC0, max UDMA/100
ata2.00: 40020624 sectors, multi 16: LBA
ata1.00: HPA unlocked: 78175679 -> 78177792, native 78177792
ata1.00: ATA-5: MAXTOR 6L040J2, A93.0300, max UDMA/133
ata1.00: 78177792 sectors, multi 16: LBA
While the second disk matches the wikipedia table (ATA-6 introduced
UDMA/100), the first one doesn't: UDMA/133 wasn't supposed to exist in
standard ATA-5.
Digging old logs, I also found this (same machine, same kernel,
different drive):
ata2.00: ATA-4: WDC WD102AA, 05.05B05, max UDMA/66
Here again, UDMA/66 wasn't supposed to exist in standard ATA-4.
Can anyone explain this mystery to me?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-04 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-04 13:48 Jean Delvare [this message]
2012-03-04 14:55 ` ATA standard vs. speed James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120304144806.4bef0256@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox