From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] PATA host controller driver for ep93xx Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:50:32 +0000 Message-ID: <201204041250.32344.arnd@arndb.de> References: <4F7B0C54.8010804@metasoft.pl> <201204032008.00509.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:54688 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756141Ab2DDMuf (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:50:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Rafal Prylowski , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Sergei Shtylyov , "bzolnier@gmail.com" , "rmallon@gmail.com" , "joao.ramos@inov.pt" On Tuesday 03 April 2012, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > The SYSCON stuff is not exposed outside of the arch specific mach-ep93xx > directory. I would prefer this stay like it is for now. If/when ep93xx gets > converted to device tree we can address this. Ok, fair enough. > I have been looking over the drivers/pinctrl stuff to see if it's worth creating > a pinctrl-ep93xx.c driver. If I end up doing one, the function above could > probably be replaced with something from the pin mux api. Yes, that sounds like a good long-term plan. Arnd