linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: JBottomley@parallels.com
Cc: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
	Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartek Nowakowski <bartek.nowakowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] libsas: fix ata_eh clobbering ex_phys via smp_ata_check_ready
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:37:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120413233727.8025.82428.stgit@dwillia2-linux.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120413233343.8025.18101.stgit@dwillia2-linux.jf.intel.com>

The check_ready implementation in the expander-attached ata device case
polls on sas_ex_phy_discover().  The effect is that the ex_phy fields
(critically ->attached_sas_addr) can change.  When ata_eh ends and
libsas comes along to revalidate the domain
sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr() can fail to lookup devices to remove, or
fail to re-add an ata device that ata_eh marked as disabled.  So change
the code to skip the sas_address and change count updates when ata_eh is
active.

Cc: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Tested-by: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>
Tested-by: Bartek Nowakowski <bartek.nowakowski@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index 37c3c3f..c1f91b1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, void *rsp)
 	u8 sas_addr[SAS_ADDR_SIZE];
 	struct smp_resp *resp = rsp;
 	struct discover_resp *dr = &resp->disc;
+	struct sas_ha_struct *ha = dev->port->ha;
 	struct expander_device *ex = &dev->ex_dev;
 	struct ex_phy *phy = &ex->ex_phy[phy_id];
 	struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev->rphy;
@@ -209,6 +210,8 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, void *rsp)
 	char *type;
 
 	if (new_phy) {
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(SAS_HA_ATA_EH_ACTIVE, &ha->state)))
+			return;
 		phy->phy = sas_phy_alloc(&rphy->dev, phy_id);
 
 		/* FIXME: error_handling */
@@ -233,6 +236,8 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, void *rsp)
 	memcpy(sas_addr, phy->attached_sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE);
 
 	phy->attached_dev_type = to_dev_type(dr);
+	if (test_bit(SAS_HA_ATA_EH_ACTIVE, &ha->state))
+		goto out;
 	phy->phy_id = phy_id;
 	phy->linkrate = dr->linkrate;
 	phy->attached_sata_host = dr->attached_sata_host;
@@ -266,6 +271,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, void *rsp)
 			return;
 		}
 
+ out:
 	switch (phy->attached_dev_type) {
 	case SATA_PENDING:
 		type = "stp pending";
@@ -304,7 +310,15 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, void *rsp)
 	else
 		return;
 
-	SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy%02d:%c:%X attached: %016llx (%s)\n",
+	/* if the attached device type changed and ata_eh is active,
+	 * make sure we run revalidation when eh completes (see:
+	 * sas_enable_revalidation)
+	 */
+	if (test_bit(SAS_HA_ATA_EH_ACTIVE, &ha->state))
+		set_bit(DISCE_REVALIDATE_DOMAIN, &dev->port->disc.pending);
+
+	SAS_DPRINTK("%sex %016llx phy%02d:%c:%X attached: %016llx (%s)\n",
+		    test_bit(SAS_HA_ATA_EH_ACTIVE, &ha->state) ? "ata: " : "",
 		    SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy->phy_id,
 		    sas_route_char(dev, phy), phy->linkrate,
 		    SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr), type);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 23:36 [GIT PATCH 00/12] libsas fixes for 3.4 Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:36 ` [PATCH 01/12] libsas: introduce sas_work to fix sas_drain_work vs sas_queue_work Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] libsas: cleanup spurious calls to scsi_schedule_eh Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] libata, libsas: introduce sched_eh and end_eh port ops Dan Williams
2012-04-21  6:19   ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-22 17:30   ` James Bottomley
2012-04-23  2:33     ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-23  8:10       ` James Bottomley
2012-04-23 19:13         ` Dan Williams
2012-04-23 22:22           ` James Bottomley
2012-04-23 22:49             ` Dan Williams
2012-04-24 10:11               ` Jacek Danecki
2012-04-23 19:41     ` Dan Williams
2012-04-26 17:21       ` Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] libsas: fix sas_find_bcast_phy() in the presence of 'vacant' phys Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] libsas: fix sas_get_port_device regression Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 06/12] libsas: unify domain_device sas_rphy lifetimes Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 08/12] libata: make ata_print_id atomic Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] libsas, libata: fix start of life for a sas ata_port Dan Williams
2012-04-21  6:20   ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 10/12] scsi: fix eh wakeup (scsi_schedule_eh vs scsi_restart_operations) Dan Williams
2012-04-21 12:22   ` James Bottomley
2012-04-22 15:24     ` Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 11/12] libsas: fix false positive 'device attached' conditions Dan Williams
2012-04-22 10:53   ` James Bottomley
2012-04-22 15:56     ` Dan Williams
2012-04-13 23:37 ` [PATCH 12/12] scsi_transport_sas: fix delete vs scan race Dan Williams
2012-04-22 10:38   ` James Bottomley
2012-04-22 15:43     ` Dan Williams
2012-04-22 17:15       ` James Bottomley
2012-05-05 21:52         ` Dan Williams
2012-05-20 19:20           ` Dan Williams
2012-04-14  8:19 ` [GIT PATCH 00/12] libsas fixes for 3.4 jack_wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120413233727.8025.82428.stgit@dwillia2-linux.jf.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=bartek.nowakowski@intel.com \
    --cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
    --cc=jack_wang@usish.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.patelczyk@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).