From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, spear-devel@list.st.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mturquette@linaro.org,
sshtylyov@mvista.com, jgarzik@redhat.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] ata/sata_mv: Remove conditional compilation of clk code
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:29:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120424142939.GG24089@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOh2x==YaPxYxigyE=n2weoKHhu4ktGRHHGdzgs2+d1_Lo-D4Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:12:10PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
> On 4/24/12, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> > Sorry, but still wrong.
> >
> > The clock is optional. If we can find a clock, turn it on. If not,
> > keep going....
> >
> > You patch causes the missing clock to become a fatal error.
> >
> > This sata_mv exists in multiple forms. It can be part of a SoC. It can
> > also be on a PCI bus. In the PCI form, it is unlikely to have a clk
> > which can be controlled. When built into a SoC, namely one of the
> > Orion family, dove, orion5x, mv78xx0 do not have a clock which can be
> > controlled. However kirkwood does have a clock.
> >
> > So, kirkwood will provide a clock and expects that sata_mv will turn
> > it on. All the other ways of using sata_mv will not provide a clock,
> > but still expect the driver to be happy.
>
> Hmm. What this code does now is:
> If HAVE_CLK is selected, then there must be a clock for the device. Otherwise
> it will always pass.
>
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
hpriv->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(hpriv->clk))
- dev_notice(&pdev->dev, "cannot get clkdev\n");
- else
- clk_enable(hpriv->clk);
-#endif
+ if (IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot get clkdev\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(hpriv->clk);
+ }
+
+ clk_enable(hpriv->clk);
There are three use cases....
1) The platform does not implement HAVE_CLK. So we are using your NOP
operations.
clk_get() returns NULL.
IS_ERR(NULL) is false. So it keeps going, calls clk_enable() which is
also NOP and the driver is happy.
2) The platform does have HAVE_CLK. So we are using driver/clk/
code. There is no clk defined for the device, since there is no
controllable clk. Its using the PCI clock, or some hard wired
internal SoC clock.
clk_get() returns ERR_PTR(-ENOENT)
IS_ERR(hpriv->clk) is true, you output a dev_err() and the device
probe fails.
This is wrong. Not having the clk is not fatal. The old code would
carefully not call clk_enable(), since it has an error pointer, not
have a valid clk, and would also not call clk_disable during
removal.
3) The platform does have HAVE_CLK. So we are using driver/clk/ code.
There is however a gateable clock driving this lump of silicon.
clk_get() returns a valid pointer to a clk.
IS_ERR(hpriv->clk) is false, so it keeps going.
clk_enable() is called and the driver is happy.
Well, actually, his brings up a new issues
static int __clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
{
int ret = 0;
if (!clk)
return 0;
if (WARN_ON(clk->prepare_count == 0))
return -ESHUTDOWN;
this should actually be clk_prepare_enable(). Did you see my
patches adding generic clk framework support for Orion. I fixed
this as part of that patch set.
Anyway.... You asked:
> You want not to return error if a platform does have HAVE_CLK, but
> doesn't have a clock for sata? That would be simple to fix, but want
> to confirm if this is actually required.
Correct.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1335266056.git.viresh.kumar@st.com>
2012-04-24 11:21 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] ata/pata_arasan: Remove conditional compilation of clk code Viresh Kumar
2012-04-24 11:21 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] ata/sata_mv: " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-24 12:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-24 12:51 ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-04-24 13:42 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-24 14:29 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2012-04-24 17:02 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-25 5:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-24 17:05 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-24 20:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-25 3:02 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-25 5:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-25 6:43 ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-04-25 7:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-25 8:35 ` Lothar Waßmann
2012-04-25 9:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-25 10:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-25 11:24 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120424142939.GG24089@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
--cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
--cc=viresh.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox