From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v3)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:33:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502193343.GA6411@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA1898C.5070108@teksavvy.com>
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:22:52PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> ATA and SATA drives have had built-in retries for media errors
> for as long as they've been commonplace in computers (early 1990s).
>
> When libata stumbles across a bad sector, it can waste minutes
> sitting there doing retry after retry before finally giving up
> and letting the higher layers deal with it.
>
> This patch removes retries for media errors only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> ---
> version 3: try to improve readability.
>
> --- old/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c 2012-04-27 13:17:35.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c 2012-05-02 15:20:19.946827031 -0400
> @@ -2046,6 +2046,26 @@
> }
>
> /**
> + * ata_eh_worth_retry - analyze error and decide whether to retry
> + * @qc: qc to possibly retry
> + *
> + * Look at the cause of the error and decide if a retry
> + * might be useful or not. We don't want to retry media errors
> + * because the drive itself has probably already taken 10-30 seconds
> + * doing its own internal retries before reporting the failure.
> + */
> +static inline int ata_eh_worth_retry(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
Return bool? && maybe split the patch into two - the first separating
out the logic into a function, the latter changing emedia handling?
> +{
> + if (qc->flags & AC_ERR_MEDIA)
> + return 0; /* don't retry media errors */
> + if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO)
> + return 1; /* otherwise retry anything from fs stack */
> + if (qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID)
> + return 0; /* don't retry these */
> + return qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV; /* retry if not dev error */
> +}
Other than that,
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-02 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-01 20:12 ata_eh_link_autopsy: Bug? Mark Lord
2012-05-01 20:27 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-01 21:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-01 23:48 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-01 23:52 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02 0:00 ` [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors Mark Lord
2012-05-02 3:03 ` [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v2) Mark Lord
2012-05-02 15:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-02 19:10 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02 19:22 ` [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v3) Mark Lord
2012-05-02 19:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-05-02 19:43 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02 19:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-04 2:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-05-04 3:04 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120502193343.GA6411@google.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).