From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "Rus V. Brushkoff" <brushkoff@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AMD SP5100 SATA low perfomance
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:25:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727102521.GA14445@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKu2wpQe+SR3BSsrf+oNzfok6OdQtBKMeYfTGdNOcc-s-AWjjQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:22:14PM +0300, Rus V. Brushkoff wrote:
> > "Sh*t" really only begins to describe this. So let me get this
> > correctly: your Hitachi hdds weren't mounted in a very stable manner to
> > the mobo chassis and vibrations from the fan caused them to fail writes
> > and retry a _lot_ leading to the write performance drop?
>
> The HDD's _was_ mounted very tight and stable, so the FAN vibration is
> propagated to HDD without the problems, next the internal
> accelerometer founds this vibration and lowers all the HDD operations
> ! If I get out the HDD from the case and mechanically isolate it from
> the FAN vibration the speed momentally grows to the max value !
>
> > And the WD ones don't have a problem with the vibrations?
>
> The desktop WD do not have this issue as it has much more mass than
> mobile one. As you can see by tests made by me - the mobile WD behaves
> nearly same as Hitachi one - it lowers the HDD operations by -20Mb/s
> value.
So the Hitachi ones are lighter than the WD ones and behave like mobile
hdds in that respect.
Oh well, good to know for next time when buying hdds.
I have one final question. You said:
"The same HDD with another SATA controller (checked with Asus M2NPV and
M5A78 m/b) shows normal write (150Mb/s-300Mb/s) perfomance."
Does that mean that the Hitachi hdd which was performing badly in the
Tyan board, didn't receive vibrations when connected to the Asus mobo
simply because the Asus mobo is in a different chassis which absorbs
vibrations somehow?
All I'm saying is, if you switch mobos and use the same chassis which
generates vibrations, you should be seeing the same performance drop
with the Asus board and this way confirm your findings.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-27 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 18:34 AMD SP5100 SATA low perfomance Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-24 20:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-25 6:47 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-26 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-26 10:07 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-26 13:48 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-26 14:36 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
[not found] ` <20120726180854.GD9161@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
[not found] ` <CAKu2wpThVHc9nAL=xvcPSKcv-cnOFp+Y41CpQyxsqo292FzjRA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-27 8:23 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-27 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-27 9:22 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-27 10:25 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-07-27 10:39 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
2012-07-27 10:57 ` Dave Howorth
2012-07-27 11:17 ` Rus V. Brushkoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120727102521.GA14445@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=brushkoff@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox