linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] scsi: sr: support runtime pm for ODD
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:49:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905224912.GA1443@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1209051154400.1837-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> 
> > > > > That flag is badly named. Something like "insert_event_during_suspend"
> > > > > would be better.
> > 
> > This flag means, the reason the device gets runtime resumed is due to
> > user as described by the above situation 2, not by software(e.g. by
> > sr_check_events).
> > 
> > I don't quite understand insert_event_during_suspend mean here...
> 
> It means: An insert event occurred while the device was suspended.

Thanks, I got it now.

> 
> > > > >  And even so I don't see why you wouldn't
> > > > > want to suspend for example a drive with an inserted but unopened disk.
> > > > 
> > > > I assume that Aaron wanted to handle the easiest case first.  Adding 
> > > > suspend/resume handling to the open/close routines can be done later.
> > > 
> > > Sure, but this patch blocks that in contrast to just not implementing it.
> > 
> > It's already implemented. I did it in scsi_cd_get/put.
> > 
> > And the reason I didn't allow runtime suspend for medium inside and door
> > closed case are:
> > 1 ZPODD has a spec and it didn't allow that;
> 
> In theory we should allow runtime suspend in this case too, but leave 
> the power on.  (Although in practice, turning the power off would 
> probably work even though it may violate the spec.)
> 

Agree. But it's not easy to implement with autosuspend.
Please see below.

> > 2 It's not easy to implement. Imagine user just inserts a disc, and the
> > sr_suspend routine checks that door is closed so that it wants to
> > suspend the device. But actually, after user just inserts a disc, he
> > definitely wants to use the device, so it's not a good thing to do. And
> > if ZPODD is used, the device will be powered off instantly when the door
> > is closed, this is not good.
> 
> That's why we have an autosuspend delay.  Although for some reason the 
> SCSI subsystem doesn't use it currently...  We need to add a call to 
> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() in scsi_sysfs_add_sdev().  Likewise, the 
> pm_schedule_suspend() call in scsi_runtime_idle() should be changed to 
> pm_runtime_autosuspend().  And there should be calls to 
> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay() in the sd and sr drivers.

I tried to use autosuspend when preparing the patch, but the fact that
the devices will be polled every 2 seconds make it impossible to enter
suspend state if the autosuspend delay is larger than that.

-Aaron

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-05 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-04 14:24 [PATCH v6 0/7] ZPODD patches Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] scsi: sr: support runtime pm for ODD Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 15:57   ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-04 17:59     ` Alan Stern
2012-09-04 18:47       ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-05 15:22         ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-05 16:08           ` Alan Stern
2012-09-05 22:49             ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2012-09-06 15:06               ` Alan Stern
2012-09-06 15:25                 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-06 17:08                   ` Alan Stern
2012-09-06 18:06                     ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-06 18:50                       ` Alan Stern
2012-09-10  9:16                         ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-10 10:45                           ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-11  6:44                             ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-11  8:55                               ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-11  9:24                                 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-11  9:30                                   ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-11 11:11                                     ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-11 12:10                                       ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-11 12:31                                         ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-11 12:35                                           ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-11 12:13                                     ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-07 14:53                 ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-07 15:41                   ` Alan Stern
2012-09-05 18:06           ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-06  5:55             ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-06  5:17     ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] block: genhd: export disk_(un)block_events Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] scsi: sr: block events checking when suspended for zpodd Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] libata: acpi: set can_power_off for both ODD and HD Aaron Lu
2012-09-07  2:37   ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] scsi: pm: add may_power_off flag Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 16:01   ` Oliver Neukum
2012-09-06  1:52     ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] scsi: sr: use may_power_off Aaron Lu
2012-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] libata: acpi: respect may_power_off flag Aaron Lu
2012-09-07  2:38   ` Jeff Garzik
2012-09-13  2:42 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] ZPODD patches Jack Wang
2012-09-13  3:20   ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-13  8:15     ` Jack Wang
2012-09-13  8:30       ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-13  8:39         ` Jack Wang
2012-09-13  8:56           ` Aaron Lu
2012-09-13  9:01             ` James Bottomley
2012-09-13  9:12             ` Jack Wang
2012-09-13  9:19               ` [PATCH " Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120905224912.GA1443@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.de \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).